Buddhist content on Wikisource and Wikipedia.
| SUMMARY | |
|---|---|
| Version | 2.0 | 
| Mission | We develop tools and processes to help wikipedians contribute Buddhist texts on Wikisource, facts on Wikidata and knowledge on Wikipedia โ at scale. | 
| Chair(s) | @Kaldan | 
| Communication: | - Discord Channel - GitHub Team - Google Calender | 
| Documentation: | -  PRD(Requirements)  - Progress Board  - Visual  - Meeting Minutes | 
Charter Details
1. Mission and Scope
- 
Mission: We develop tools and processes to help wikipedians contributing Buddhist texts on Wikisource, facts on Wikidata and knowledge on Wikipedia โ at scale. 
- 
In Scope: A bulleted list of what this WG is responsible for. - Example: Managing the projectโs CI/CD systems.
- Example: Owning and maintaining the project/infracode repository.
- Example: Defining and enforcing data backup and recovery policies.
 
- 
Out of Scope: A bulleted list of what this WG is explicitly not responsible for, to prevent ambiguity. - Example: Managing user-facing application features.
- Example: Setting the projectโs overall strategic direction.
 
2. Responsibilities and Deliverables
- 
Core Responsibilities: A clear, bulleted list of the WGโs ongoing duties. - Example: Triage and prioritize bugs and feature requests related to owned assets.
- Example: Review and merge pull requests against owned repositories.
- Example: Publish a quarterly status report to the community.
 
- 
Key Deliverables: Tangible services or products the WG provides. - Example: A stable and documented build and test environment.
- Example: Public-facing dashboards for system health and performance.
 
3. Governance and Decision Making
- 
Decision-Making Process: How does the WG make decisions? - Example: โDecisions are made by lazy consensus. Proposals are posted to the mailing list for 72 hours. If no objections are raised, the proposal is accepted. If there are objections, a formal vote is held during the next meeting, requiring a simple majority to pass.โ
 
- 
Conflict Resolution: How are disagreements handled? - Example: โDisagreements are first discussed within the WG. If a consensus cannot be reached, the WG Chair makes the final call. Decisions can be appealed to the projectโs Steering Committee.โ
 
4. Membership and Roles
- 
Members: - @Kaldan โ Chair
- Emiliya โ Coordinator
- Tsewang โ Wikipedian Mentor
 
- 
Contributors: - Choekdup
- Gyaltsen Dhargyal
- Tseten Dolma
 
WG Meeting Calendar
- Meetings: [e.g., 2nd Tuesday of each month, 16:00 UTC]
- Meeting Minutes: [Link]