Prompt to generate disambiguated gloss

✨ Prompts
1

Prompt to generate Disambiguated Gloss using UCCA semantic interpretation

Prompt


Create a word-by-word disambiguated gloss for the following Tibetan text using the provided UCCA semantic interpretation. The gloss should:

1. **Format**: Present as a markdown list with one entry per word/morpheme
2. **Structure**: Each entry should contain:
   - The Tibetan word/morpheme
   - Its disambiguated translation based on the semantic context
   - Clarifications in square brackets including:
     - Grammatical analysis (case, tense, etc.)
     - Root word and meaning
     - Contextual interpretation informed by the UCCA analysis
     - Semantic role from the UCCA structure

3. **Integration**: Use the UCCA semantic interpretation to inform your translation choices, but present clarifications in natural language without referencing UCCA terminology

## Example Output

For the input 'འདོད་པའི་དཔེས་':
```markdown
- འདོད་པའི་ : which are accepted [Genitive of `འདོད་པ་`: to desire, accept, assert; here (the illustrative examples) which are accepted, agreed-upon; functions as Adverbial modifier in UCCA structure]
- དཔེས་ : through examples [Instrumental of `དཔེ་`: example, dṛṣṭānta; by means of a common illustrative example (like a mirage or dream) used to demonstrate the illusory nature of phenomena; part of "the example that is accepted by both sides" per UCCA analysis]
```

## Guidelines

- Prioritize semantic accuracy over literal translation
- When UCCA indicates implicit meanings, incorporate them into your clarifications
- If the UCCA analysis shows specific semantic roles (Agent, Patient, Process, etc.), reference these in your brackets
- For particles and grammatical markers, explain their function in context
- When words have multiple possible meanings, choose the one that best fits the UCCA semantic interpretation

---

**Text to analyze**: རྣལ་འབྱོར་པ་ཡང་བློ་ཁྱད་ཀྱིས། །གོང་མ་གོང་མ་རྣམས་ཀྱིས་གནོད། །གཉི་ག་ཡང་ནི་འདོད་པའི་དཔེས། །འབྲས་བུའི་དོན་དུ་མ་དཔྱད་ཕྱིར།

**UCCA semantic interpretation**: " [Type: Parallel Scenes | Desc: \""Root node containing three parallel scenes\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── རྣལ་འབྱོར་པ་ཡང་བློ་ཁྱད་ཀྱིས། །གོང་མ་གོང་མ་རྣམས་ཀྱིས་གནོད། [Type: Scene | Desc: \""Scene describing how higher yogis refute lower yogis\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── རྣལ་འབྱོར་པ་ཡང [Type: Participant-Center | Desc: \""The yogis who are the central topic being discussed\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── བློ་ཁྱད་ཀྱིས [Type: State | Desc: \""The distinguishing quality or state of yogis' minds\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── གོང་མ་གོང་མ་རྣམས་ཀྱིས [Type: Participant-Agent | Desc: \""The higher yogis who refute the lower ones\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n └── གནོད [Type: Process | Desc: \""The process of refutation or invalidation\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── གཉི་ག་ཡང་ནི་འདོད་པའི་དཔེས། [Type: Scene | Desc: \""Scene describing how both sides accept the example\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── གཉི་ག་ཡང [Type: Participant-Patient | Desc: \""The two sides or positions being discussed\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── ནི [Type: Linker | Desc: \""Topic marker connecting participants to the rest of the scene\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── འདོད་པའི་དཔེས [Type: Adverbial | Desc: \""The example that is accepted by both sides\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n └── [agree/accept] [Type: Process | Desc: \""The implicit process of agreeing on or accepting the illusory example\"" | Implicit: \""The implicit process of agreeing on or accepting the illusory example\""]\n └── འབྲས་བུའི་དོན་དུ་མ་དཔྱད་ཕྱིར། [Type: Scene | Desc: \""Scene explaining that analysis is not done for the sake of results\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── [practitioners/those on the path] [Type: Participant-Agent | Desc: \""The implicit practitioners who do not analyze for the sake of results\"" | Implicit: \""The implicit practitioners who do not analyze for the sake of results\""]\n ├── མ་དཔྱད [Type: Process | Desc: \""The process of not analyzing or examining\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n ├── འབྲས་བུའི་དོན་དུ [Type: Purpose | Desc: \""The purpose for which analysis is not performed\"" | Implicit: \""\""]\n └── ཕྱིར [Type: Relator | Desc: \""Causal marker explaining the reason\"" | Implicit: \""\""] "